<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cymek &#187; Travel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cymek.com/tag/travel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cymek.com</link>
	<description>Perceived Power Corrupts Absolutely</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sony NEX-5: The Perfect Travel Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2011/sony-nex-5/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sony-nex-5</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2011/sony-nex-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/2011/looking-out-over-paris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking Out Over Paris, originally uploaded by Craig Damlo. I’m not a professional photographer, but, like many, I am a dedicated amateur. Like most dedicated amateurs out there, I have a full-time career that helps support my photography habit. Luckily for me, I have the advantage in my everyday career to travel, both domestically and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;"><a title="photo sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5370688706/"><img style="border: solid 2px #000000;" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5290/5370688706_ee09325017.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5370688706/">Looking Out Over Paris</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">Craig Damlo</a>.</span></div>
<p>I’m not a professional photographer, but, like many, I am a dedicated amateur. Like most dedicated amateurs out there, I have a full-time career that helps support my photography habit. Luckily for me, I have the advantage in my everyday career to travel, both domestically and internationally. I don’t always have the space or weight to bring along my full DSLR and lenses with me on business trips.<br />
I have heard time and time again that the best way to improve your photography is by shooting more. The number one way to take more pictures is to always carry your camera with you. While most phones today can take pictures, camera phones do not have the option to control the more technical aspects of your photography, which leaves three other options: 1) A point-and-shoot pocket camera; 2) Carry your DSLR camera everywhere you go; or 3) an electronic view interchangeable lens (EVIIL) camera.</p>
<p><strong><span id="more-415"></span>Size matters</strong></p>
<p>A point-and-shoot camera can be a good option, especially based on the size and portability, but most have the same problem as your phone, limited control. This sets limits on creativity. In a perfect world carrying your DSLR with you would be the best option, but for an individual like myself, I don’t always have the option to pack and carry an extra 5 lbs in my suitcase. The sweet spot seems to fall in the EVIL camera camp, and the Sony NEX-5 is a great option in that market.</p>
<p><strong>Ergonomics</strong></p>
<p>Many reasons went into my selection of the Sony NEX-5, but the number one reason was the size and ergonomics of the camera. The Sony NEX-5 is one of the smallest EVIL cameras on the market. Rather than being a typical candy-bar shape like many point-and-shoots, it is wider on the side thanks to a small but effective grip. Sony also did a great job on keeping a simplistic design with very few dials and buttons. This, along with the hand grip, allows for settings to be easily adjusted with one hand while shooting.<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>User friendly</strong></p>
<p>As mentioned earlier Sony have done a great job of is balancing the user-friendliness for novices with the needs of more advanced users. My main DSLR is a Sony Alpha 900. When looking at the EVIL cameras, I was worried that the user-assistance options would simply get in my way and impede my use of the camera, but, with the release of firmware version 3, Sony has allowed the advanced user to remap the functions of two buttons (Sony calls them “soft buttons”), which makes the camera quicker to use. Sony seems to have found a very nice balance between advanced user options and my ability to hand the camera to my mom; both of us can easily and happily use the camera.<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Helpful soft buttons</strong></p>
<p>For the novice user, the camera offers “Scene Selection” modes as well as an “Intelligent Auto” mode that does everything for you. When using the Intelligent Auto feature the soft buttons offer some helpful features for the complete beginner. One soft button is mapped as a “Shooting Tips” button that brings up a handy tip based on the type of photo being taken. These tips range from basics on how to hold the camera to optimize the best stabilization to more advanced tips such as how to control the depth of focus in a macro photo.</p>
<p>The second soft button is programed as a “Background Defocus” button. When the user presses this button, it brings up a slider (which is controlled with the scroll wheel) that goes from “Defocus” on one end to “Crisp” on the other. The background defocus simply controls the f-stop. However, it does it in plain language, allowing any user to control this aspect of his or her photographs.<br />
For the advanced user any time the camera is set to Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, Manual Exposure, or Program Auto, the two soft keys can be custom programed. The first soft key can be set to a single function from a list of many options, ranging from the Sony Shooting Tips to ISO setting. The second soft key is a bit more advanced because it can be set to a allow quick changing of a single option or up to three settings by pressing the button multiple times. These programmable soft keys have vastly improved the usability of the camera, and they have allowed advanced users to make adjustments quicker without the need for digging through camera menus.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Although the Sony NEX-5 will never replace my Sony Alpha 900 as my only camera, it has proven itself as a great travel camera. Shortly after getting my Sony NEX-5 in early 2011 I took an international business trip and packed the Sony NEX-5 and left my Sony Alpha 900 at home. It showed its value before even boarding the aircraft: My carry-on bags came in just under the limit to allow me to bring them on the plane. The added weight of a full DSLR would have easily put my bag over the weight limit and I would have been forced to check that valuable equipment into the hold.<br />
The Sony NEX-5 has also turned out to be a great camera for a rushed afternoon of site-seeing around the Palace at Versailles in France and an evening in Paris. Although it was still winter in France, my jacket pockets were the perfect home for the camera, and I wasn’t the traditional target of thieves with a full camera hanging around my neck.</p>
<div>Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0</a></div>
<div>This article was originally published in the April 2011 issue of <a title="PhotoComment" href="http://www.photocomment.net/">PhotoComment Magazine</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2011/sony-nex-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Photographer&#8217;s Bucket List</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2011/the-photographers-bucket-list/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-photographers-bucket-list</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2011/the-photographers-bucket-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/2011/the-photographers-bucket-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feeling Free, originally uploaded by Craig Damlo. I'm not sure if I have a photography "bucket list," but, if I did, the shot above would have been on it. I'm not sure what else would be on my list, and I'm also not sure if it's important to have a list written down. The real [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;"><a title="photo sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5407115024/"><img style="border: solid 2px #000000;" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5016/5407115024_2c71e903a0.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5407115024/">Feeling Free</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/craigdamlo/">Craig Damlo</a>.</span></div>
<p>I'm not sure if I have a photography "bucket list," but, if I did, the shot above would have been on it. I'm not sure what else would be on my list, and I'm also not sure if it's important to have a list written down. The real importance of the bucket list is to keep me out shooting and looking for "that shot."<br />
<span id="more-408"></span><br />
When my wife and I (well, my wife, anyway) planned our trip to Hawaii this year, I said that the one thing I would love to get a shot of is a breaching humpback whale. I'm not sure if I actually expected to get one or not; I would have been happy to just see it, let alone photograph it. And, what luck we had on our whale watching tour! I lost count around 10 or so breaches, and I'm pretty sure we saw at least a dozen breaches. I didn't get that perfect photograph of the whale filling the frame with pixel-peeper perfect sharpness, but I guess that means I have a reason to continue shooting.</p>
<div>Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2011/the-photographers-bucket-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rich Dogs Breathe Easy</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2010/rich-dogs-breathe-easy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rich-dogs-breathe-easy</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2010/rich-dogs-breathe-easy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxygen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pull Mask to Initiate Flow of Oxygen, originally uploaded by Craig Damlo. From my in-depth study of modern society—through TV reality shows—I know that it's the children of the rich that live the easiest lives with the most comfort. And now their pets get the safest travel (they are already getting the most luxurious travel). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/4338875616/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4060/4338875616_977e20afbe.jpg" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/4338875616/">Pull Mask to Initiate Flow of Oxygen</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/craigdamlo/">Craig Damlo</a>.</span>
</div>
<p>From my in-depth study of modern society—through TV reality shows—I know that it's the children of the rich that live the easiest lives with the most comfort. And now their pets get the safest travel (they are already getting the most luxurious travel). I've talked <a href="http://www.cymek.com/2009/do-animals-get-oxygen/">here</a> about <a href="http://www.petairways.com/">Pet Airways</a> and asked if pets get oxygen in the event of the loss of cabin pressure, and they didn't. Now <a href="http://www.4pawsaviation.com/">4 Paws Aviation</a> is offering <a href="http://www.4pawsaviation.com/hoods.html"> supplemental oxygen hoods</a> for dogs; well, dogs that fly on private jets anyway! These hoods still won't help my dogs who are down in the cargo area because you can only carry this onto a private jet at this point. Then, you would need to don it on the dog (after you have donned your own mask first) after a loss of cabin pressure. I've only flown with my dogs once in the cargo hold, but I still wish there was some way of ensuring that they would be able to continue to breathe in the event of a loss of cabin pressure.<br />
<span id="more-267"></span></p>
<p>The bigger animal oxygen issue that still hasn't been addressed is that of race horses being flown to and from races. Now these animals can be worth millions of dollars and are flown on cargo planes—ie, with the rest of the cargo. The issue with horses in the back is this: when a fire is detected in the cargo area, the procedure is to decompress the aircraft and fly at a high altitude to starve the fire of oxygen. There are two problems with supplying these animals with oxygen; first, a supernumerary (ie, a person flying on a cargo flight who is not part of the flight crew) would have to go back into the cargo hold with the fire to don the hood onto the horse. Mind you, it's not just the fire that's the problem; the person would need to be wearing a positive-pressure oxygen mask with a portable oxygen source, but the aircraft would also be maneuvering, which would make it even more difficult to navigate the cargo hold. Secondly, let's look at the fire itself. One of the reasons for not providing the horse with oxygen is that, if the fire burns for any amount of time, the horse would be cooked alive in the cargo hold. If it isn't given oxygen, it simply dies while passed out and isn't put through the pain of the fire.</p>
<div>Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2010/rich-dogs-breathe-easy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tourist Travel Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2009/tourist-travel-photography/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tourist-travel-photography</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2009/tourist-travel-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schonbrunn Palace tiny tourists, originally uploaded by Aschaf. I've seen lots of books and blog posts and the what not about how to do travel photography: where to go, when to go, and what equipment to bring. I've also seen all the information on how to make a proud mom/dad a better photographer by capturing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/3006552560/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3004/3006552560_b4cbc0be5e.jpg" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/3006552560/">Schonbrunn Palace tiny tourists</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/aschaf/">Aschaf</a>.</span>
</div>
<p>I've seen lots of books and blog posts and the what not about how to do travel photography: where to go, when to go, and what equipment to bring. I've also seen all the information on how to make a proud mom/dad a better photographer by capturing family occasions and trips. All this is great information, but what about those of us amateurs who travel not just to photograph and those of us who travel with nonphotographers? Or what about when we are on a business trip and have limited time, equipment, and choices? So, this is a call and an announcement! If you know of the type of information I am looking for, let me know; I'll also try to share my experiences and tips as I get them while I do my style of photography and travel.<br />
<span id="more-91"></span><br />
I know the first tip that I've read is to give your family cameras. This is a great option if your family is willing to accept it, and then get into photography. But, I think that my business travel photography may pose a bigger challenge than tourist travel photography.</p>
<p>Also, don't get me wrong because I love reading the blogs and books of travel photographers such as <a href="http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/">David duChemin</a>, <a href="http://www.stuckincustoms.com/">Trey Ratcliff</a>, and <a href="http://www.thedigitaltrekker.com/blog/">Matt Brandon</a> to name a few. But these guys are professional photographers and are traveling purely for photography. Just once I would like to see them taking pictures of something like the  Lincoln Memorial, and then they explain to their spouses that they want to see something else and they're going to wait here until dusk. I know these guys tell as about all the bad situations, but they also are so much more prepared for these situations. When I go to Paris for work, I don't have room for an additional case for cameras, lenses, and flashes. And, even when I'm traveling as a tourist, <a href="http://damlo.tumblr.com/">Sherri</a> will only carry so much equipment for me.</p>
<div xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/3006552560/">Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY 2.0</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2009/tourist-travel-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

