<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cymek &#187; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cymek.com/tag/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cymek.com</link>
	<description>Perceived Power Corrupts Absolutely</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sony NEX-5: The Perfect Travel Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2011/sony-nex-5/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sony-nex-5</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2011/sony-nex-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/2011/looking-out-over-paris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking Out Over Paris, originally uploaded by Craig Damlo. I’m not a professional photographer, but, like many, I am a dedicated amateur. Like most dedicated amateurs out there, I have a full-time career that helps support my photography habit. Luckily for me, I have the advantage in my everyday career to travel, both domestically and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;"><a title="photo sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5370688706/"><img style="border: solid 2px #000000;" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5290/5370688706_ee09325017.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5370688706/">Looking Out Over Paris</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">Craig Damlo</a>.</span></div>
<p>I’m not a professional photographer, but, like many, I am a dedicated amateur. Like most dedicated amateurs out there, I have a full-time career that helps support my photography habit. Luckily for me, I have the advantage in my everyday career to travel, both domestically and internationally. I don’t always have the space or weight to bring along my full DSLR and lenses with me on business trips.<br />
I have heard time and time again that the best way to improve your photography is by shooting more. The number one way to take more pictures is to always carry your camera with you. While most phones today can take pictures, camera phones do not have the option to control the more technical aspects of your photography, which leaves three other options: 1) A point-and-shoot pocket camera; 2) Carry your DSLR camera everywhere you go; or 3) an electronic view interchangeable lens (EVIIL) camera.</p>
<p><strong><span id="more-415"></span>Size matters</strong></p>
<p>A point-and-shoot camera can be a good option, especially based on the size and portability, but most have the same problem as your phone, limited control. This sets limits on creativity. In a perfect world carrying your DSLR with you would be the best option, but for an individual like myself, I don’t always have the option to pack and carry an extra 5 lbs in my suitcase. The sweet spot seems to fall in the EVIL camera camp, and the Sony NEX-5 is a great option in that market.</p>
<p><strong>Ergonomics</strong></p>
<p>Many reasons went into my selection of the Sony NEX-5, but the number one reason was the size and ergonomics of the camera. The Sony NEX-5 is one of the smallest EVIL cameras on the market. Rather than being a typical candy-bar shape like many point-and-shoots, it is wider on the side thanks to a small but effective grip. Sony also did a great job on keeping a simplistic design with very few dials and buttons. This, along with the hand grip, allows for settings to be easily adjusted with one hand while shooting.<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>User friendly</strong></p>
<p>As mentioned earlier Sony have done a great job of is balancing the user-friendliness for novices with the needs of more advanced users. My main DSLR is a Sony Alpha 900. When looking at the EVIL cameras, I was worried that the user-assistance options would simply get in my way and impede my use of the camera, but, with the release of firmware version 3, Sony has allowed the advanced user to remap the functions of two buttons (Sony calls them “soft buttons”), which makes the camera quicker to use. Sony seems to have found a very nice balance between advanced user options and my ability to hand the camera to my mom; both of us can easily and happily use the camera.<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Helpful soft buttons</strong></p>
<p>For the novice user, the camera offers “Scene Selection” modes as well as an “Intelligent Auto” mode that does everything for you. When using the Intelligent Auto feature the soft buttons offer some helpful features for the complete beginner. One soft button is mapped as a “Shooting Tips” button that brings up a handy tip based on the type of photo being taken. These tips range from basics on how to hold the camera to optimize the best stabilization to more advanced tips such as how to control the depth of focus in a macro photo.</p>
<p>The second soft button is programed as a “Background Defocus” button. When the user presses this button, it brings up a slider (which is controlled with the scroll wheel) that goes from “Defocus” on one end to “Crisp” on the other. The background defocus simply controls the f-stop. However, it does it in plain language, allowing any user to control this aspect of his or her photographs.<br />
For the advanced user any time the camera is set to Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, Manual Exposure, or Program Auto, the two soft keys can be custom programed. The first soft key can be set to a single function from a list of many options, ranging from the Sony Shooting Tips to ISO setting. The second soft key is a bit more advanced because it can be set to a allow quick changing of a single option or up to three settings by pressing the button multiple times. These programmable soft keys have vastly improved the usability of the camera, and they have allowed advanced users to make adjustments quicker without the need for digging through camera menus.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Although the Sony NEX-5 will never replace my Sony Alpha 900 as my only camera, it has proven itself as a great travel camera. Shortly after getting my Sony NEX-5 in early 2011 I took an international business trip and packed the Sony NEX-5 and left my Sony Alpha 900 at home. It showed its value before even boarding the aircraft: My carry-on bags came in just under the limit to allow me to bring them on the plane. The added weight of a full DSLR would have easily put my bag over the weight limit and I would have been forced to check that valuable equipment into the hold.<br />
The Sony NEX-5 has also turned out to be a great camera for a rushed afternoon of site-seeing around the Palace at Versailles in France and an evening in Paris. Although it was still winter in France, my jacket pockets were the perfect home for the camera, and I wasn’t the traditional target of thieves with a full camera hanging around my neck.</p>
<div>Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0</a></div>
<div>This article was originally published in the April 2011 issue of <a title="PhotoComment" href="http://www.photocomment.net/">PhotoComment Magazine</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2011/sony-nex-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Digital Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2010/the-digital-valley/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-digital-valley</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2010/the-digital-valley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/2010/the-digital-valley/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Digital Valley, originally uploaded by Craig Damlo. Today we enter a new landscape for this blog, one that I hope will improve the number of posts found here. I spend much more time working on my photography than anything else outside of work. So I'm going to start making use of Flickr's blog integration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;"><a title="photo sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5241816546/"><img style="border: solid 2px #000000;" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5087/5241816546_98b16a8057.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/5241816546/">The Digital Valley</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/craigdamlo/">Craig Damlo</a>.</span></div>
<p>Today we enter a new landscape for this blog, one that I hope will improve the number of posts found here. I spend much more time working on my photography than anything else outside of work. So I'm going to start making use of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">Flickr's</a> blog integration to post pictures directly to this site. I will promise not to simply dump my photos directly here, as they can already be seen in that form on my <a href="http://craigd.tumblr.com/">Tumblr</a> and my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">Flickr</a>. With any luck and a bit of dedication from me <a href="http://www.cymek.com/">Cymek</a> will become a much more dynamic site.</p>
<div><span id="more-323"></span>Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/craigdamlo/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2010/the-digital-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I Need Anticarbon to Offset Carbon?</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2009/do-i-need-anticarbon-to-offset-carbon/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=do-i-need-anticarbon-to-offset-carbon</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2009/do-i-need-anticarbon-to-offset-carbon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I've linked to Anthony Watts' blog before, but this one just wants me to ask people why are so stupid. Mind you, not Anthony Watts, but the people using carbon offsets. In this post Watts discusses a new kiosk at SFO that will sell travelers carbon offsets for their flights. And, if that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I've linked to <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/">Anthony Watts' blog</a> before, but this one just wants me to ask people why are so stupid. Mind you, not Anthony Watts, but the people using carbon offsets. In this <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/18/carbon-offset-kiosk-at-sfo-sells-carbon-credits-at-60-times-the-market-rate/">post</a> Watts discusses a new kiosk at SFO that will sell travelers carbon offsets for their flights. And, if that isn't stupid enough, the kiosk is charging 60 times the market value for carbon offsets. Here is my question: How the hell do you offset carbon? Can I just give $50 to someone who was going to fly to SFO to not fly to SFO so then I've successfully offset my own carbon? That is insane—the carbon has already been released—unless someone is  removing the actual carbon or forcing anticarbon onto it and destroying it. If not, the carbon is <em>still there</em>. If I was correct on just giving someone else $50 to not fly when I fly, then I am now selling carbon offsets to people who may commute to work. And, seeing as how I work from home and do not drive into an office, I can offset their carbon by working from home. So, with that being said, please send me two times fair market value for my carbon offsets.....end rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2009/do-i-need-anticarbon-to-offset-carbon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tourist Travel Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2009/tourist-travel-photography/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tourist-travel-photography</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2009/tourist-travel-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schonbrunn Palace tiny tourists, originally uploaded by Aschaf. I've seen lots of books and blog posts and the what not about how to do travel photography: where to go, when to go, and what equipment to bring. I've also seen all the information on how to make a proud mom/dad a better photographer by capturing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; padding: 3px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/3006552560/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3004/3006552560_b4cbc0be5e.jpg" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/3006552560/">Schonbrunn Palace tiny tourists</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/aschaf/">Aschaf</a>.</span>
</div>
<p>I've seen lots of books and blog posts and the what not about how to do travel photography: where to go, when to go, and what equipment to bring. I've also seen all the information on how to make a proud mom/dad a better photographer by capturing family occasions and trips. All this is great information, but what about those of us amateurs who travel not just to photograph and those of us who travel with nonphotographers? Or what about when we are on a business trip and have limited time, equipment, and choices? So, this is a call and an announcement! If you know of the type of information I am looking for, let me know; I'll also try to share my experiences and tips as I get them while I do my style of photography and travel.<br />
<span id="more-91"></span><br />
I know the first tip that I've read is to give your family cameras. This is a great option if your family is willing to accept it, and then get into photography. But, I think that my business travel photography may pose a bigger challenge than tourist travel photography.</p>
<p>Also, don't get me wrong because I love reading the blogs and books of travel photographers such as <a href="http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/">David duChemin</a>, <a href="http://www.stuckincustoms.com/">Trey Ratcliff</a>, and <a href="http://www.thedigitaltrekker.com/blog/">Matt Brandon</a> to name a few. But these guys are professional photographers and are traveling purely for photography. Just once I would like to see them taking pictures of something like the  Lincoln Memorial, and then they explain to their spouses that they want to see something else and they're going to wait here until dusk. I know these guys tell as about all the bad situations, but they also are so much more prepared for these situations. When I go to Paris for work, I don't have room for an additional case for cameras, lenses, and flashes. And, even when I'm traveling as a tourist, <a href="http://damlo.tumblr.com/">Sherri</a> will only carry so much equipment for me.</p>
<div xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/3006552560/">Photo Credits: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/aschaf/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY 2.0</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2009/tourist-travel-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Link? Watt&#8217;s Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://www.cymek.com/2009/a-link-watts-up-with-that/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-link-watts-up-with-that</link>
		<comments>http://www.cymek.com/2009/a-link-watts-up-with-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CraigD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cymek.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've never created a post about another blog. Okay, I only have about three posts, so that's not a huge statement. But, regardless, I think this is a really great site. It is no big secret to people who know me that I don't agree with the current global warming theories floating around. And it's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've never created a post about another <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/">blog</a>. Okay, I only have about three posts, so that's not a huge statement. But, regardless, I think this is a really great site. It is no big secret to people who know me that I don't agree with the current global warming theories floating around. And it's not that I don't believe the Earth isn't warming—I can't really say, but I disagree with it being all of humanity's fault. But, before I build myself a little soap box, I just want to direct people to Anthony Watt's blog, <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/">Watt's Up With That?</a> What I really like about his site is that he has in-depth posts and he uses reputable scientific papers to support his statements; it also has lots of great images/graphs. My blog is still young, but it's nice to see something I can dream it to be.<br />
<span id="more-100"></span><br />
Also, one last thing on global warming, and this is why I think everyone should keep an eye on Watt's <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/">blog</a>: science cannot be decided by majority vote; data must be provided to universally "undispute" the theory. Also, according to the definition of a theory, a theory should make clear predictions that can be tested. I'm sick of crap like, "Oh, it's hot because of global warming," and, "Oh, it's cold because of global warming," or, "Oh, it's windy because of global warming," or, "Oh, more people are born with blue eyes because of global warming." It just feels like everyone is attributing everything and anything to global warming, and, obviously, there is nothing being done to try to falsify these statements—<em>which is something that true scientists do</em>.</p>
<p>So, remember kids, if a theory can't be falsifiable, it isn't science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cymek.com/2009/a-link-watts-up-with-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

